I like these compilation views, especially for models like the Reverso which has been through many many cases. I don't remember having seeing it here. Sadly it misses a few from the past (at least the original '30s Reverso and XGT). Source: grail-watch.co...
and not living in a city with a store that sold them, so I could try them on. Especially for a watch that some people find doesn't sit well on their wrist. I had this one... ...
I bought my XGT "blind": no seeing no trying 😊 as the offer was way too good to be missed. I knew I took a risk as it has a strong presence on the wrist (size and weight) but it suits me perfectly. For Reverso, I think the risk is bigger with both extreme...
It's kind of funny but I seem to sell off watches with Arabic Numerals and tend to trend to Roman or just markers. I have a couple with a limited number of numerals on them but the full set like this watch doesn't seem to stick although I love the art dec...
but with rectangular it's a whole different thing. My Parmigiana Kalpa is something like 56 or something and the GP 1945 is 30 something. The lugs seem to make more of a difference in rectangular as well.
Mine appears to be around 47-48 mm long, lug to lug. And the case width is around 28mm. Thus, I would say mine is a Reverso Classic Large Small Seconds (with slightly longer lugs).
I wanted the Septantieme and the Grande GMT to work on my wrist, but they were both too big for me. Fortunately, the time-only Grand Taille size works beautifully on my wrist. The 1990s limited edition Reverso models were the first watches that got me exc...