johnnymoped
108
Great one
And nothing wrong at all.
But I wish JLC would listen and not release all the nice homages (like the tribute to 1931) in (in my opinion) unwearable sizes.
But obviously I‘m in the minority with this opinion as I also think my 38.5mm Omega Seamster is a tad too big for my 6 3/4 in wrist. 
Reverso Classique from the 90s
„Are you man enough for a small watch“ was the title of a NYT article 5y ago. So, obviously I am. ;-) Gotta love the original Reverso size. This is a Classique model from 1995 in white gold on a custom CF strap. ...
Lovely watch that one.
Nothing wrong with the Classique size it looks fine on the wrist. Here’s mine. Regards Kev. ...
Great one
And nothing wrong at all. But I wish JLC would listen and not release all the nice homages (like the tribute to 1931) in (in my opinion) unwearable sizes. But obviously I‘m in the minority with this opinion as I also think my 38.5mm Omega Seamster is a ta...
Does size matter now?
In a UK national newspaper today there is a long article about sexism in watches raised by an AD. Instead of men's watches and ladies watches, they should only be referred to by the case sizes. The article pointed out that several female "celebrities" wea...
Great question
And I totally agree but in the same topic JLC is actually marketing the medium Reverso (which ironically is even a bit bigger than the Classique) as a ladies watch.
