I agree with you that they are great looking watches but as a vintage collector, I am wondering how these "fake" old watches will age. They already pretends to be old... How will a fake patina looks in 20 or 30 years (patina on patina)?... These watches will have nothing to say in 30 years down the road other than:" look, I was born/made when people where making "fake" vintage watches". They have no own story to tell. In France they say "on ne peut pas être et avoir été".
I think that this global trend to systematically relaunch old watches/models shows an immense lack of creativity. I am not blaming JLC here as they almost all do the same. Especially Omega is making reeditions of almost all its models from the 60ies and 70ies. Only Longines does more reeditions. At least Rolex uses Tudor to do it and does not "degrade" its core brand.
But JLC is supposed to be a Grande Maison and should not do it. They should resist to short term profits (obviously they cannot as Richemont is a listed company) and keep the brand focused on its core values. They have classics like the Reverso, that's fine. Why making artificially aged dials too? Again, they are good looking watches but, still, only copies.
This is the reason why I did not buy any of these reeditions, though some are damn good looking. There are still too many real vintage watches out there (Geophysic be ready, I am coming....). The day I do not find any vintage watch anymore, I will consider these (expensive) placebos.
Just my (usual) two cents