Does it really take us to philosophy? or to good manners, proper language and humility?
May I quote Ilja? "the entire chapter about the E858 is plain non-sence, picturing a franken watch. Congratulations. It should read E856 ...." And which watch is then used as an illustration by Ilja: a Gübelin retailed E856 Parking IpsoVox.
However, despite this very affirmative message and severe judgement, we were given both an example of a Gübelin retailed E858 Parking IpsoVox and a scan of a Gübelin catalog where is E858 is displayed. As I own the catalog, I would like to precise that is was printed in 1966.
It is now clear that Ilja's sarcastic congratulations were uncalled-for and his statement about the E858 Parking being a "non sense" is just ... wrong. End of the story.
If I step back, I consider that collecting watches is a continuous lesson of humility. Especially with Jaeger Lecoultre.
It took years to find the first strong evidence that dauphine hands were also correct for the Geophysic Chronometer. Recently, I discovered that there had been at least one E875 Memovox in ... white gold.
I don't know if this is a philosophical view, but I like this one: "The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know."
Coming back to the subject, I would like to add a minor contribution with my rose gold Parking Memovox as this watch made for the French Market had a very specific elegant case with thiner lugs and (unsigned also original!-) crowns.
