john3
94
thanks for the information if you say the 88
was alot heavier than the 176 than i think the 177 might be a little lighter than i like because i thought the 88 was a tad lighter than my 000 if that makes any sense
Hello everyone was wondering the forum's opinion in a version of this or that
Have my choice narrowed to pam005 or pam177 hopefuly this will quench my pam thirst enough until next year when i go for my grail. Thanks for your input.
Either Pam 5 or 177 are good choices,
It only depends on the fact to know if you prefer the Logo or not... I'd say that you'd better save your money for the next years pams, my friend... Maybe we'll see something of big interest??? Best. nicolas This message has been edited by amanico on 2008...
Pam 005 vs. Pam 177
Too me the primary differences between the two are: 1) Polished (shiny look) for the logo vs titanium (muted look) for the 177. Which do you prefer? Most Panerai's are polished. 2) The weight of the watches is a big difference. The titanium is much lighte...
i guess the biggest difference aside from the ti/steel
is the caseback. the 177 is display and the 005 is not. i have had a 000 and a 25, the 25 didnt seem that much lighter than the zero but maybe that was because it was a sub? i have also had a 183, 243, and an 88. the 88gmt which alot of people really like...
Pam 176 was very light...
I had a Pam 176, and compared to my Pam 228 or Pam 88 (GMT,steel,auto) it's a huge difference in weight. I'm afraid I can't answer the exact difference in weight from a non-gmt or non- auto Pam, but I'm sure someone here will. Good luck hunting, palmasea
Welcome here, Montrachet!
Always nice to see one more Paneristi, here! Looking forward to read you often ,here! Maybe you can post a pic of your watch? I'm sure it wil help those who consider this watch. Best. Nicolas
Thank you for the warm welcome. Here is a nice wrist shot ...
... of the 177. Montrachet...