AnthonyTsai
[PuristS]
22366
For me, I still voted for the fang
I thought I would like the circular power reserve indicator since I never really liked the fang indicator. But the more I looked at the circular indicator, the more I didn't like it. I think if Panerai changed the look of the circular indicator, I might like it better than the fang, but with this current layout, I don't like it much.
Also, maybe give the hand another shape such as an arrow or anything other than the Panerai leaf hand so it differentiates itself from the other hands on the dial.
Cheers,
Anthony
POLL: Which Panerai power reserve indicator display do you like?
Hey all, I thought this would make for an interesting poll since we haven't had a poll in quite some time. Cheers, Anthony ===== PAM344 - circular (left) & PAM319 - fang (right)...
must make some comment
I voted circular but between those 2 I would say fang. But it was not a chtonograp I would probably prefer circular
I have to say when the fang first came out I hated it...
Now I love it...I will say though if the PR on the 344 was a little different I might change my vote..to me it just gets lost in the dial like it is
I too disliked the Fang but it has historic significance and it draws your eye.
I actually like it now.
For me, I still voted for the fang
I thought I would like the circular power reserve indicator since I never really liked the fang indicator. But the more I looked at the circular indicator, the more I didn't like it. I think if Panerai changed the look of the circular indicator, I might l...
Another vote for the fang...
I still prefer the original fang, but IMO the circular version would look great if it had a different hand. Regards, ED-209...
the Panerai PR versions looks like Porsche
head lights for 911 models: - 964, 993 and then 997 versus 996 (rejected or "wrong" version) for Porsche's purists Cheers, patrickh
Another comparison
I wonder if the pink gold on the 344 and 319 are indeed different. I've always thought that the PG case made by Panerai were a still a touch too yellow/goldish for my taste but the colour tone of the 344 pictured here seemed almost perfect to me!
Def the fang for me... its unique to Panerai
All the other brands already have the circular one... Interesting poll
Authentic against logic, corrupted by automotive and aeronautic instruments, I voted...
circular but it seems that i am on the loser side! This message has been edited by luc00 on 2009-12-18 14:55:38 This message has been edited by luc00 on 2009-12-18 14:56:10
To my own surprise I voted for the fang.
I wasn't a big fan of the fang and I still don't love it but the dial just looks odd to me. Could it be that over time the fang will be accepted as a signature Panerai detail? I think that I will always prefer the PR indicator on the back - like the 190 -...
+1 for the fang
but I will always prefer the PR indicator on the back (eg: discontinued PAM 190).
Fang, but...
Like shown on these pictures, I definitely prefer the fang indicator. I am sure though, that the circular indicator would look much better if the hand would be in the same style as the small seconds and the chrono hands.
Thanks Anthony
I think the fang adds some deepness to the dial. The circular looks to me poor and flat.... Fang PR is also more special, unique