i_am_Sam
2841
I have a question Nicolas...
Is that always the case of Richemont's watch brands?
I mean let's take Panerai's P999 calibre which I read was based on Piaget's Antiplano movement also the one in the 309 & 322 was based on Minerva movement and not forgetting the chronograph movement on the Ferrari Chronograph and the new Mare Nostrum.
And if I'm not mistaken, Cartier and VCA also use a lot of JLC and Piaget's movement.
By right, can they call them their in-house movement?
Now the definition of in-house movement seems to be biased to me, I thought it's supposed to be all made by the manufacture, such as the P2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005...
Your advice will be greatly appreciated
Have a great weekend
SamRotandi
In House is a very relative concept, at Panerai...
By: amanico : July 3rd, 2010-11:41
But an expensive one! Well, the movements are taken from ETA, Valfleurier, Minerva or Piaget, and Panerai used to house Rolex, Angelus, Zenith, JLC, which is not an exhaustive list. Therefore, as Panerai was a " Laboratorio de Ideas ", the simpler is the ...
just to clarify
By: nicholsun : July 3rd, 2010-11:58
I think I get what you're saying, but just to check. You're point is that the so called in house movements are only relatively more "in house" than previously? You don't think they're original or just more so than before?
I have a question Nicolas...
By: i_am_Sam : July 4th, 2010-02:42
Is that always the case of Richemont's watch brands? I mean let's take Panerai's P999 calibre which I read was based on Piaget's Antiplano movement also the one in the 309 & 322 was based on Minerva movement and not forgetting the chronograph movement on ...