Where is the laboratory of ideas?
Post-Vendome watches have only 12 years of existence, why this need to already pumping from it…?
The early customers purchased serialized /numbered pieces, why destabilizing the 'values' of their wears?
Whereas it is to make use of stock ETA movements or to reappropriate a model with ‘in-house movements’ is it justified to already replicate or duplicate?
I find this above titled topic and discussion to be wrong. I think it is an offence to many to see their watches re-re-replicated. Whilst some may fell lucky to be able purchase NOS watches or same but slightly re-specified, others see their desired rare watches popping out by hundreds from the genuine production lines, leaving them with somewhat a bad taste...
I think that many committed offerings ought to be respected by their proposers, what do you say?
This message has been edited by PoyFR on 2010-01-27 02:28:17 This message has been edited by PoyFR on 2010-01-27 02:45:35