Subexplorer[Moderator - WristScan]
33284
Hello my dear friend KM! Thank you for your kind message!
Always my big pleasure to share my watches and thoughts here.
Absolutely agree with you that the caseback relief image omission was a cost reducing decision.
A minor flaw but a very nice feature of previous variant which is lost!
The watch is big but a bit thinner than previous generations. My wrist is thin at 17 cms but the watch seats very comfortable and doesn’t look so big I feel.
Comfort on our own wrists not only depends on the size of a watch but also shape of lugs and shape of our wrists as per my personal experience.
You should try this (or any other watch) in your own wrist to appreciate it better.
Agree about the IWC Ocean 2000. But regrettably present IWC divers are big and thick though I adore my Aqua Timer which at 42mm is a very thick watch.
Thank you gain for your kind message my dear friend!
Cheers! Abel