G99
13685
if i were you Nicolas i know what i would go for
although i already have it. i would go for a 105.003-64. they may not have broad arrow hands, but they are possibly the first ones that you can readily buy in original condition and the last of the straight lugs.
if you are desperate for broad arrows etc then go for the 1957 replica made in 1998-2001, which i've also got. it may be newer, but it has all the bits that you want.
this hunt for a 2915/2998 will drive you to stop drinking 
best
G
A series of CK 2915 pictures.
I know nothing on this reference, being too scared by the many reassembled / Franken / Fakes and so on watches when it comes to the 2915. Finding a correct one is an almost impossible mission, and when you find it, you have to fund it, which is another di...
Very nice watch, as usual wonderful pictures
A very nice reconditioned watch. Odd not to find the slightest lume defect on the hands and the slightest trace of corrosion on the hands and the rehaut. A pity about the polishing of the front face of the case. Still, let's not spit in the soup, a very n...
That is the problem with the CK 2915.
This is a true mine field. I think a 2998 is more in my league. Even if I found this one pretty... nice. ;) As for the pics, when you love watches, it is easy to take some good pics. Better than on a watch you don't like. Best, Nicolas
Agreed on the 2998
I agree about the 2998. Also more in my league and more chance of finding one in its original pure state. I understand what you mean when you write that one tends getting better result taking pictures of watches that one likes. But as much I love my watch...
Yes, I feel more comfortable with the 2998.
There are too many traps with the 2915... Way too many for me. As for pictures, it is just a matter of time. Don't forget two golden rules: Light, and stability. Then, try some settings... And after think about the best way to avoid reflection... It will ...
Leicaleica... :)))
Don't forget I a married with an Italian girl who taught me all these words... :) Maaa che oooh! Nicolas
good case. only the confirmed movement number can tell you,....
if this is an 2915 or an 2998 with a 2915 back. on the dial: the original dial has very long luminous markers. was changed with later 2998 versions. the original hands have some distinct features too. the original hour hand is slightly curved in itself; t...
My observations
Dial is correct for 2915-1 to -3 Hands (hour and minute) correct for 2915-1 and -2; -3 should have alpha hands The subdial hands look a bit funny to me - a bit too stout with the possible exception of the one in the hour subdial. Lollipop may be correct f...
Thank you a lot, MSNWatch for your input.
Which proves all the complexity of this reference... I learnt a lot! Thank you. Nicolas
if i were you Nicolas i know what i would go for
although i already have it. i would go for a 105.003-64. they may not have broad arrow hands, but they are possibly the first ones that you can readily buy in original condition and the last of the straight lugs. if you are desperate for broad arrows etc ...
Well, without going for the Broad arrow hands, I prefer the Dauphine hands
Of the 2998 to the baton hands of the 105 003. Even if the 2998 has a major flaw... It is not from '64. :) Best, my friend. Nicolas
Getting the Holy Trinity with Lollipop second hand for each of them,
That is an ambitious project! ;) Best, my friend. Nicolas
But hey..
... Although the watch has some replacements it's very nice and you have taken some great pictures :-) Best Hans