Patek Philippe

2011 was a generous year in terms of new additions to the ticking collection. One of the new timepieces added was the 5712-1A. When I received it I thought it would be somewhat of an underdog compared to the 5980. But...au contraire. The 5712 gets a lot o...  

Was the only reason which led me to sell it. Well, it was also to fund my 5070. BUT both are great watches. The 5712 dial is vibrant, the 5980 is super original with its mono subdial, and how appealing! Superb duo, my friend. Best, Nicolas

But my money will alays go on the 5712/1A, got mine ordered!!

No message body

nt

... complicated watches rest in the mover ... simple 2 hands not necessarily it starts with dates and forex day-dates ... with a moon-phase there is no way to wind it for wearing. Have a great day Rob

No message body

No message body

Because even if you were adjusting the moonphase for months less than 31 days, you'd only be doing this five times a year. And even this is not necessary as one could (and should) simply depress the button on the side of the case with a wooden toothpick t... 

When you wind it after 3 or 4 days without wearing it... So, you have to set the moonphase... It is not only once a month, Patrick, it is way much often. Best, Nicolas This message has been edited by amanico on 2012-01-29 11:58:50

I like the offset dial tremendously. The 5980 was nice from the back. But, didn't do it for me from the front (although, a the 5960 is spectacular). And as much as I like thick watches and bigger diameters, the 5712 is the winner.

I prefer 5980 because the dial looks more 'balance' compare to 5712. 5712 dial looks 'messy' especially the power reserve. Just my 2 cents...

The 5980 is great Patek to own and in ten years time it will still be admired and respected. The depth of the case excentuates the original "Submarine hatch" design with the hinge on the case. Cronolust