But since you said clearly....chose ONE...5207. For it's tourbillon, and annual calendar(I have always preferred Pateks's annual calendar then the QPs) Best, Horo
If I should be ever able, and be also prepared, to spend that sort of monet for a Patek: the 5073 would be my choice. Certainly the 5207 P is a better buy as potentiall with a much, much better return than the 5073 in case of a sale, BUT: it lacks charm, ...
Two of the PPs that I wont even look at the store - let alone wear them even given free. I love Pateks for their understated beauty - not for their "loud" presence. I guess I belong to the old school. Cheers. Jim
Or 5074 actually (without stones), one of the most amazing case done by Patek with this large bezel, a sublime caliber with the gongs and not too thick. Balance, class, perfection. The 5207 is a marvel for sure, but thicker a bit more complex in every poi...
thanks guys, I am still torn betweeen sheer complex beauty and a complicated masterpiece... i dont mind watches with bling, so that puts the 5073 on the conquest.. and i love the complicated 5207, guess will take a look in the geneva boutique next week to...