But since you said clearly....chose ONE...5207. For it's tourbillon, and annual calendar(I have always preferred Pateks's annual calendar then the QPs)
But since you said clearly....chose ONE...5207. For it's tourbillon, and annual calendar(I have always preferred Pateks's annual calendar then the QPs) Best, Horo
If I should be ever able, and be also prepared, to spend that sort of monet for a Patek: the 5073 would be my choice. Certainly the 5207 P is a better buy as potentiall with a much, much better return than the 5073 in case of a sale, BUT: it lacks charm, ...
Two of the PPs that I wont even look at the store - let alone wear them even given free. I love Pateks for their understated beauty - not for their "loud" presence. I guess I belong to the old school. Cheers. Jim
Or 5074 actually (without stones), one of the most amazing case done by Patek with this large bezel, a sublime caliber with the gongs and not too thick. Balance, class, perfection. The 5207 is a marvel for sure, but thicker a bit more complex in every poi...
thanks guys, I am still torn betweeen sheer complex beauty and a complicated masterpiece... i dont mind watches with bling, so that puts the 5073 on the conquest.. and i love the complicated 5207, guess will take a look in the geneva boutique next week to...