quattro
[Moderator]
18303
I was just thinking of the setting itself,
I mean the metal base holding the gem. And I dislike the claws used for the square indexes.
OMG: this is one of my dream references, it’s an absolute masterpiece, one my greatest mistakes
Passing when this was just $60,000
Stunner
Love the Wenger case and 12-600 movement! The diamonds and pp crown are icing on the cake!
That is the bees knees Esp in plat
Here is the yg model The design of the case is just spectacular And yes it has the 12-600 auto ...
Lovely photo with Irish green grass in the background ! Perfect !
The diamond hour markers are executed wonderfully, subtle at a glance yet prominent when dial is examined in detail !
Beautiful watch!
But, as almost always, I find the setting of the rectangular indexes more pleasing than that of the square ones. Best, Emmanuel
Depends; the later 27-460 movement version ref 3433 has a rectangular index at six - imho much worse than square as makes subseconds v busy which I dislike a lot
also same on 27-460 update to 2526 …ref 3428 ...
I was just thinking of the setting itself,
I mean the metal base holding the gem. And I dislike the claws used for the square indexes.
here is a 3445p full baguettes
open setting on baguettes defo nicer but personally prefer dial balance of mixed with smaller indices especially at 6 as baguette there makes subseconds v cluttered. maybe long vs short baguettes would have been mega design ...
I think short baguettes except at 6, 9 & 12 would have been ideal.
Or maybe yours is better after all: I don't know any more now... Thanks for sharing.
good to compare to hone design preferences
same similar process i used to decide which i liked but going through again with you hammered it home again for me. tx
