amanico[JLC Moderator]
402127
Small, thick, but full of charm. That was a nice reference.
I heard that Patek had big issues to make the split seconds reliable, on the 5004. Rumor or fact?
Good idea, this post!
Best,
Nicolas
I didn't remember that
By: Mark in Paris : July 24th, 2015-08:05
That's quite a figure, I wonder how they'll do with this year's piece? This 5004 was in Ti and had a very specific dial. The Onlywatch 2015 is a Triple complication but more classical in its outfit (except it is made of Steel). Thanks Gordon! Cheers, Mark...
Thank you
By: el1125 : July 23rd, 2015-21:28
for the posting on 5004. For me, my 5204 white dial is my current favorite Patek watch I own. I tried on the 5004 first several variants before deciding and the watch proportions were not for me. Much too small on MY wrist and much too tall. It's a nice w...
Not far away?
By: dr.kol : July 24th, 2015-08:33
Something around 40k away. It's the price of a car... Anyhow, for me this is not so difficult: First of all, the dial of 5370 is in my eyes superior. Secondly, the perpetual module adds the price with 40k - that's pretty hefty. Thirdly, the case of 5370 i...
In fact,
By: Mark in Paris : July 24th, 2015-08:43
when I look at the normal Perpetual Calendar (let's say 5139 or 5940) and a normal chronograph from the brand (5170), I noticed we come roughly to a Chrono Perpetual Calendar reference (5270) tag. Hence when I see the difference of 5370 versus 5204, it is...