.. the fact, that Tudor communicated too much the heritage aka Tribute argument,
leads the interestee too much into the comparison issue.
Taken on its own, it appears an attractive offer, despite the presence of the snowflake
hand, the red crown seal (?) . - I rather see this watch on its own, as pointed out.
Personally, I would rather go with the blue insert of the other version(s), taking into
account that ihen it's a sportive watch which a dressy touch..
What I don't quite get is, whether the blue - apart from the MN of '81 is
another model/ year ( guess so)?- on that line, Tudor might have opted to present
the current one just with the color options to chose from.
Which brings us back to the running Q, how close a "recreation" or "Tribute" piece
would/should resemble the original(s), rather than re- interpret design components or
optical signals..
Not an easy game, that these "heritage" offers exhibit some DNA, but still be
seen as a new species..
Thank you for sharing this mind exercise and the guiding by these nice pics.
Best, hs