amanico[JLC Moderator]
400224
And what about a superb 6542? :)))
I get you very well, my friend...
These big crowns are to damn!
Well...Such as a 6542 Galore!
Best,
Nicolas
The sentimental value ...
By: amanico : July 17th, 2010-03:30
Now, that is an important factor! If I go on this ground, I would say the GMT, as it was my first " serious " watch, the one which introduced me into watches. And as you, we lived some great and exciting moments. Aaah, by the way, I did all with my GMT, s...
I was deciding between:
By: Mr.Gatsby : July 16th, 2010-10:52
The 1675 + 5513 as opposed to the 1680 Red Submariner. I chose the latter; but I will get to the former As for your question, can I say I am both Submariner plus GMT? And maybe to complicate matters I am also SD, Explorer and Daytona as well. uh oh, now i...
GMT for me,
By: E.S : July 30th, 2010-07:34
GMT is also my first serious watch back several years ago, during my college time. When you look at the sweep second hand, always make you smile. A special watch for me I am more GMT because its function is more useful for me when travelling, while I didn...
GMT but not the IIC
By: nilomis : July 30th, 2010-08:31
Professionally I use the GMT "complication" every day. Normally, I travel with a GMT but I'm becoming a fan of alarm watches (bad influence from here?). Of course, a 1675 and a 16710 are a good pair: The pic does not show but the 1675 has a great faded be...
Sublime pair, Nilo.
By: amanico : July 30th, 2010-10:35
The patina on your 1675 is really impressive. I know what you mean about the new GMT II C. More a luxury watch, less a toolwatch. It took me a long time to appreciate it for what it is, indeed. Although, I'm disturbed by the size of the bracelet, which lo...