E.S
547
GMT for me,
GMT is also my first serious watch back several years ago, during my college time. When you look at the sweep second hand, always make you smile.
A special watch for me 
I am more GMT because its function is more useful for me when travelling, while I didnt have much water activity back then.
Since then, I try to get more Rolex for every achievement in my life.
My last addition is Sub LV,
A Crown For Every Achievement : )
Eddy
The sentimental value ...
By: amanico : July 17th, 2010-03:30
Now, that is an important factor! If I go on this ground, I would say the GMT, as it was my first " serious " watch, the one which introduced me into watches. And as you, we lived some great and exciting moments. Aaah, by the way, I did all with my GMT, s...
I was deciding between:
By: Mr.Gatsby : July 16th, 2010-10:52
The 1675 + 5513 as opposed to the 1680 Red Submariner. I chose the latter; but I will get to the former As for your question, can I say I am both Submariner plus GMT? And maybe to complicate matters I am also SD, Explorer and Daytona as well. uh oh, now i...
GMT for me,
By: E.S : July 30th, 2010-07:34
GMT is also my first serious watch back several years ago, during my college time. When you look at the sweep second hand, always make you smile. A special watch for me I am more GMT because its function is more useful for me when travelling, while I didn...
GMT but not the IIC
By: nilomis : July 30th, 2010-08:31
Professionally I use the GMT "complication" every day. Normally, I travel with a GMT but I'm becoming a fan of alarm watches (bad influence from here?). Of course, a 1675 and a 16710 are a good pair: The pic does not show but the 1675 has a great faded be...
Sublime pair, Nilo.
By: amanico : July 30th, 2010-10:35
The patina on your 1675 is really impressive. I know what you mean about the new GMT II C. More a luxury watch, less a toolwatch. It took me a long time to appreciate it for what it is, indeed. Although, I'm disturbed by the size of the bracelet, which lo...