Mpower16
614
I think based on pictures it actually wears quite large...
The Sub is iconic, but it's not perfect..I have 7.25 inch wrist and think the Rolex Maxi case wears very bulky. Personally I'm drawn more to the Yatchmaster because fit is really important to me. 39mm is my sweet spot and P39 is my current daily..
If you're not wearing it, probably better to put the money into something that isn't sitting around not getting wrist time..
Guys, I think I have Bulk-itus!
Now that I’m 45, I tend to favor slightly smaller watches, like 38 mm is really the sweet spot for me these days. I woke up this morning and asked myself, is my 40 mm Sub (with maxi case) too bulky for my 7 inch wrist?? I don’t feel this fitment issue wit...
I tend to agree although I have mostly tried for smaller watches.
Mine sits flat on the wrist. But these do seem bulky. It is a great watch. The think bezel doesn’t help in this regard. I’ve debating moving my sub but it’s a great all arounder
Thanks for your comments TCF
If you moved it, what would you consider that is less bulky and smaller?
It’s a classic icon, undoubtedly
And I have always said I’d regret giving it up. Perhaps the happy medium is 2 liner Sub. Appreciate your reply
Thanks David H
At this point, the only Rolex for me is no date Sub. Just a matter of holding current, parting with it or trying Sub 2 liner
IMHO it is not too big
It is a sports watch and the size is appropriate. But if you think it is, that is what matters. Also if you really find it uncomfortable, then that is another good reason to get rid of it. However, I would think long and hard about getting rid of this ico...
It’s looking good on your wrist…
The submariner is a classic and very versatile. I agree that you will likely regret selling it down the road.
It looks absolutely fine on your wrist.
While it may be bit “bulky” compared to the other 2, it sure sits quite well on your wrist.
If you've got bulkitis, you'll want to get this one removed.
If you don't have bulkitis, it's a perfectly fine and reasonable fit!
I'm sorry--I went for brevity and wit rather than clarity and helpfulness
But the clear and helpful version is: It looks perfectly fitting and sensible... but bulkier than I'd prefer. My taste would definitely favor an older 5-digit Sub or your Tudor or GO (both of which have fairly similar wrist coverage to a Sub of that gener...
I have a small wrist and deal with this idea frequently …is it too large.
Like the others , I think it looks appropriate for your wrist. Only you can answer that question, I would say if you find yourself avoiding wearing the watch, that might be an answer. It’s an awesome Rolex.
Good points Larry
What size is your wrist? Care to share a recent wrist shot or 2 for comparison?
Sorry, I’m late to answer your question. I am 6.5-6.75 depending where I am and whether I’ve indulged in too much.
For reference this is the 42mm Explorer same This is my 39.7 ( I think ) JLC tribute to Deep Sea ...
Most appreciated Larry!
We’re on the same page there. A date Sub is not even a consideration for me. Just if I’m keeping this no date or going with the less bulky 14060
I think it looks fine on you and it fits you pretty well.
But I can understand your concerns, I wear mostly vintage watches with 34-36mm in diameter nowadays and every time I switch to the six digit Submariner or Speedmaster I need some time to adjust. It can feel like wearing a dinner plate on your wrist at fir...
A fine post Clemens m, thanks
In the 38 mm world, I can’t help but draw comparison to my 38 mm GP Laureato. I know, it’s an apples to oranges comparison. But the GP is so sleek, light and elegant, while at the same time somehow being sporty. It’s very possible my Sub Bulk-itus comes f...
Definitely not too big in my opinion. This comes down to taste and preference.
Fortunately we have moved on from the years of grotesquely large timepieces and for me the Sub is right in the sweet spot of size. Masculine and also thin enough to stay elegant.
Well said 777Dave
Part of what makes the Sub so attractive is its relatively thin 12.5 mm case thickness. These days, I have zero interest in anything thicker. Thank you
I think based on pictures it actually wears quite large...
The Sub is iconic, but it's not perfect..I have 7.25 inch wrist and think the Rolex Maxi case wears very bulky. Personally I'm drawn more to the Yatchmaster because fit is really important to me. 39mm is my sweet spot and P39 is my current daily.. If you'...
Thanks for your candid reply
It’s a bit big and bulky indeed, hence the thread. So I’m on the fence. Time will tell!
It looks great on your wrist!
I try not to determine the size of the watch with my age (late-40's). I have roughly a 6.5" wrist so I'm obviously not going to wear a 47mm Luminor just out of sheer discomfort but I love 44mm Luminors and Submersibles and 45mm Radiomirs because I think t...
Thank you YpJ
Agreed. Completely insensible to choose watch size based on age. What I am saying, in my journey, I started out with larger 42 mm pieces. And my preference is def trending towards smaller over time. I can remember the time where 42 mm PO’s and Speedys wer...
I think 40mm is allright. And their is a reason for this size.
The wr of 1000 ft and thickness of 12mm. Make it possible. It is a divers sport watch the Sub. So let it be. You could wear your other watches for other occasions. You will miss it, if you sell the Sub. Believe me. Its great with jeans and roughing up a l...
I think it’s not he watch, it’s you.
I read all the answers and there are some who think it looks great, others saying yes it looks large. I think our perceptions are changing, but people are divided as on one side there are those with huge Apple Watches and Garmins and Cubitus, on the other...