Is it meters first or feet first that is less common?

They are opposite in the two shown.

I just saw this at my watchmakers shop today.

By: Gregineugene : May 15th, 2026-21:28

I'm not much of a Rolex guy (frankly I can't afford to be) but if I was this one would be very high on the list. Gilt 5513. The other two aren't bad either! Have a great weekend. ...

They are opposite in the two shown.

5513 MF, 1680 FF.

By: amanico : May 16th, 2026-06:28

That 1680 on the right looks to be in fantastic condition +++

By: j.jota : May 16th, 2026-03:46

Yes, I noticed that, too. ;)

By: amanico : May 16th, 2026-06:28

I’ll take the DD nobody wants ;-)

By: quattro : May 16th, 2026-05:31

Best, Emmanuel

+1

By: gary_g : May 16th, 2026-11:36

True classics. Thank you for sharing.

By: gary_g : May 16th, 2026-11:36

Cancel Options

Watermark images

Display images as:

large images
normal images
small images
thumbnail images

Place caption text:

after images
before images

Done

Upload

Rolex

Is it meters first or feet first that is less common?

I just saw this at my watchmakers shop today.

The two on the right for me!

The 5513 is the killer, here.

Is it meters first or feet first that is less common?

5513 MF, 1680 FF.

That 1680 on the right looks to be in fantastic condition +++

Yes, I noticed that, too. ;)

I’ll take the DD nobody wants ;-)

+1

True classics. Thank you for sharing.