Chromatic Fugue
1903
Patina question
Hoping to tap into the collective watch wisdom here. I’m considering the late 1980s 5513 pictured here. As you can see, there’s more patina on the markers than the hands. I’m told that the lume on the hands is in fact tritium. A couple of questions. First, does the patina differential between the hands and markers suggest that the hands were replaced at some point, or is that common even in examples where the hands are original? Second, does this patina difference matter much from a collectability perspective? Many thanks for your thoughts.


Available on the marketplace

Reference Guide
Bill · Jan 14, 2020
Explore Bill's definitive guide to vintage Rolex Submariner 'Fat Font' bezel inserts (MK1-MK3) for 5512, 5513, 1665, 1680 models. Essential for collectors.
79 replies120125 views

Vintage
Bill · Jan 11, 2020
Explore the Rolex 5513 Gilt Era (1962-1966) with Bill's expert report. Understand dial variations, serial numbers, and movement differences in this iconic vintage Submariner.
62 replies94351 views

Reference Guide
Baron - Mr Red · Oct 1, 2018
Discover the Rolex Submariner 14060M 'Long F' dial, a future classic. Baron - Mr Red details this rare variation and its significance for collectors.
55 replies51034 views

Vintage
DrStrong · Nov 24, 2009
Discover DrStrong's elusive Rolex Comex Double Red Sea-Dweller (DRSD) ref. 1665, acquired directly from a Comex diver. Explore its unique provenance, historical significance, and the debate around its authenticity.
86 replies47919 views

Vintage
DrStrong · Dec 8, 2008
Explore the history and collector appeal of Tiffany & Co. double-signed Rolex sports models, including the Submariner ref. 5513.
27 replies40632 views

Vintage
Baron - Mr Red · Feb 8, 2014
Deep dive into the Rolex Submariner 6200, exploring its history, dial variations, and the debate over its status as the first Submariner. Essential for collectors.
43 replies39874 views
Patina question
By: Chromatic Fugue : January 26th, 2024-18:20
Hoping to tap into the collective watch wisdom here. I’m considering the late 1980s 5513 pictured here. As you can see, there’s more patina on the markers than the hands. I’m told that the lume on the hands is in fact tritium. A couple of questions. First...
Got it, thanks.
By: Chromatic Fugue : January 26th, 2024-20:32
It’s one of the things that matters to me. But so is overall case condition, and the condition here is quite excellent. I’m trying to get a sense of whether, despite the patina issue, this watch should be considered a superlative example of a 5513 of its ...
I call BS
By: @that911fan : January 26th, 2024-22:48
On those hands being tritium. They sure look like Luminova to me. Also, wasn’t tritium use stopped in the 90’s? If they replaced with new hands from that era, the tritium would still not be as white as that after 20 yrs, no?
Thanks Bill.
By: Chromatic Fugue : January 27th, 2024-02:23
I’m new to the vintage sub game so I appreciate your insights. The appeal of this 5513 is that it’s (1) a clean two-liner and (2) unpolished. In those two respects it has an advantage over my existing vintage sub, the 16800 pictured here. But this thread ...