WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Seiko

Please, let's not be quite so hard on each other

 

It is true that we make claims for our watches that we might not be completely able to sustain empirically, but some of the observations you make in return are a matter of taste and not measurements.


These sorts of comparisons and resulting reactions just get our backs up and serve little purpose.

I just went back and reviewed my multi-part review of my (then) 11 Grand Seikos called A Gaggle of GSs.

Having both a GO and Patek (albeit "minor" ones) I would not have said that the finishing on either of them  is "equal" to the other, or to the GSs.

But I would say the GSs vary greatly in finishing quality and detail, and the best one or two of mine are equal to any other watch I own.

Although I didn't do it for the comparison review, in the past I was happy to take mine apart for inspection. 

I found a few rough edges on the rotors, and plenty of non-beveled edges on the plates.

I'm not sure I'd do that now though, having learned how important (and sometimes difficult) casing and resealing a movement can be.

Performance-wise, they keep great time. Value-wise - they are certainly "worth the money" if any mechanical watch is ...

Cazalea


















These pictures were taken 8-9 years ago when digital cameras were not so good.... This message has been edited by cazalea on 2013-04-21 08:08:11

  login to reply