Ulysse Nardin

Let's see some pictures of these 2 versions in the same thread... Two very different versions. If the Freak Diavolo has something from the original Freak, the Cruiser is a totally different Watch, size, shape of the case / lugs, bezel, dial, hands... The ...  

I'm rose gold black dial guy but this just doesn't work with Freak Sadly In this particular case Cruiser is better Love the way you captured depth of dial Lovely Sincerely Damjan

because its new and fresh... Like Damjan,I prefer white metals for the Freak..... Between these two the cruiser is more interesting for me... In other metals and iterations,it depends... Mo

NT

No message body

I like the hints in the case (bezel) that remind me of the original, and while I love the anchor on the Cruiser, I can't ignore the orbital flying tourbillon on the Phantom...to me the movement is "cooler" Dave

Massive vote for the Cruiser, for the moment... Best, Nicolas

mostly for the tourbillon subseconds display. I like the added complication which make the watch that much more impressive to me. As far as case/bezel/lugs either is fine with me, and I love the rose gold, my favorite precious metal for cases. I would be ... 

I see your points on the Diavolo, horologically speaking. Agreed that the Diavolo is a kind of Super Freak. Best, Nicolas

You are right, all the versions are great!

And in WG if possible... Regards, Constantin

I must admit that in WG, this is a stunner. Best, Nicolas

If we relate them with the original freak. I would think the diavolo is the big brother of the freak while the cruiser is the same age cousin. I don't see anything the cruiser has over the diavolo. They are both attractive watch but different class. If I ... 

The Diavolo has advanced the original movement design considerably with the orbital tourbillon added, while the Cruiser is perhaps a bit more cosmetic. The price difference between the two being compared here isn't small as a result. In any case, both are... 

This is the only one which came with a 42 mm case. Best, Nicolas

Currently I'm looking at ways to increase my wrist size so that I can justify for the Diavolo

The original. After you can dig a bit more, and try to get some serious gym sessions. ;) Best, Nicolas

Yes, your analysis is correct. Thanks, my friend, for your feedback. Best, Nicolas

I must choose the Freak Cruiser. As you say, The Phantom has a rather substantial extra complication on it, so from a horological standpoint, it is the winner. And I do like the old style Freaks, don't get me wrong. But the essence of the Freak is better ... 

You pointed out a very important thing: " Someone who has never owned one "... That makes a big difference. In that case, I agree that the Cruiser may be an interesting choice. But you will have to face the very big case, while the former one, and especia... 

6-3 is not so bad! If I currently owned an older Freak variant, I would not be compelled to add or trade for a Freak Cruiser. Since I do not own one, I find the "fresher" Freak Cruiser a bit more clean and appealing. I think my flat wrist will handle the ... 

Much chunkier than the original. That is a real shock for those who are used to the first generation... It needs some time to be used to... I guess. Try one, and pease keep us updated! All the best, my friend. Nicolas

I love all these pieces, but I do think you have to try them on and then really ponder the fit. It is really easy to become entranced by UN complications, especially the Freak. As an owner of the original, which is still a chunky watch, there is a bias on... 

I have nothing against big watches, as long as the proportions of the case are still harmonious. With the Cruiser, I have mixed feelings: I do like the new lugs a lot, but not the rest of the case. And its dimensions, too. And the new styled bezel, even i... 

... both are almost equally beautiful, though my preference is with the cruiser.