amanico
[JLC Moderator]
400157
Ulysse Nardin Freak Cruiser or Diavolo Phantom?
Let's see some pictures of these 2 versions in the same thread...
Two very different versions.
If the Freak Diavolo has something from the original Freak, the Cruiser is a totally different Watch, size, shape of the case / lugs, bezel, dial, hands...
The Diavolo is a big Watch, the Cruiser is even bigger. Though, the difference when you read the size of each of these versions, is far from being enormous ( 0, 5 mm, 45 mm for the Cruiser / 44, 5 mm for the Diavolo ), but in the real, the Cruiser is more bulky.
I had the possibility to take pictures of these 2 versions, in the same metal, in rose gold.
Cruiser:
Diavolo Phantom:
I long thought about that, but the first offcial pictures of the Cruiser let a curious taste in my mouth... The in the real experience didn't make me change my mind.
I much prefer the case, dial, ans bezel of the Diavolo. I find they have more character than the Cruiser.
Of course, this is a matter of taste, and it is tough to compare a normal Freak to a Freak Diavolo which is horologically more sophisticated. And we don't have to forget that difference.
One thing I love a lot on the Cruiser is the hands. They are somptuous. Really somptuous, with this marine Anchor shape.
What is your opinion, on those versions?
Best,
Nicolas.
Ulysse Nardin Freak Cruiser or Diavolo Phantom?
Let's see some pictures of these 2 versions in the same thread... Two very different versions. If the Freak Diavolo has something from the original Freak, the Cruiser is a totally different Watch, size, shape of the case / lugs, bezel, dial, hands... The ...
You know...
I'm rose gold black dial guy but this just doesn't work with Freak Sadly In this particular case Cruiser is better Love the way you captured depth of dial Lovely Sincerely Damjan
Freak Cruiser for me...
because its new and fresh... Like Damjan,I prefer white metals for the Freak..... Between these two the cruiser is more interesting for me... In other metals and iterations,it depends... Mo
I will go against the trend and favour the Diavolo...
I like the hints in the case (bezel) that remind me of the original, and while I love the anchor on the Cruiser, I can't ignore the orbital flying tourbillon on the Phantom...to me the movement is "cooler" Dave
Aaah, Dave, thanks for reducing the score. I have somethin in mind which may explain that
Massive vote for the Cruiser, for the moment... Best, Nicolas
I prefer the Diavalo/Phantom
mostly for the tourbillon subseconds display. I like the added complication which make the watch that much more impressive to me. As far as case/bezel/lugs either is fine with me, and I love the rose gold, my favorite precious metal for cases. I would be ...
You are an excellent diplomat, Stewart. ;)
I see your points on the Diavolo, horologically speaking. Agreed that the Diavolo is a kind of Super Freak. Best, Nicolas
5-2 for the Cruiser, so far. Thanks for your feedback, Constantin.
I must admit that in WG, this is a stunner. Best, Nicolas
I have a different view on these two.
If we relate them with the original freak. I would think the diavolo is the big brother of the freak while the cruiser is the same age cousin. I don't see anything the cruiser has over the diavolo. They are both attractive watch but different class. If I ...
I think you are right...
The Diavolo has advanced the original movement design considerably with the orbital tourbillon added, while the Cruiser is perhaps a bit more cosmetic. The price difference between the two being compared here isn't small as a result. In any case, both are...
You still can hunt a first version.
This is the only one which came with a 42 mm case. Best, Nicolas
That will be my fall back.
Currently I'm looking at ways to increase my wrist size so that I can justify for the Diavolo
Still you can start with the first.
The original. After you can dig a bit more, and try to get some serious gym sessions. ;) Best, Nicolas
I don't know where to put your vote. :))) BUT...
Yes, your analysis is correct. Thanks, my friend, for your feedback. Best, Nicolas
As a big fan of the line but someone who has never owned one...
I must choose the Freak Cruiser. As you say, The Phantom has a rather substantial extra complication on it, so from a horological standpoint, it is the winner. And I do like the old style Freaks, don't get me wrong. But the essence of the Freak is better ...
6-3 for the Cruiser, it is a massacre. ;) BUT...
You pointed out a very important thing: " Someone who has never owned one "... That makes a big difference. In that case, I agree that the Cruiser may be an interesting choice. But you will have to face the very big case, while the former one, and especia...
Agreed (not w/ the massacre part, the other part!)
6-3 is not so bad! If I currently owned an older Freak variant, I would not be compelled to add or trade for a Freak Cruiser. Since I do not own one, I find the "fresher" Freak Cruiser a bit more clean and appealing. I think my flat wrist will handle the ...
The problem of the Cruiser is that its case is really chunky.
Much chunkier than the original. That is a real shock for those who are used to the first generation... It needs some time to be used to... I guess. Try one, and pease keep us updated! All the best, my friend. Nicolas
Agree with you Nicolas...continued
I love all these pieces, but I do think you have to try them on and then really ponder the fit. It is really easy to become entranced by UN complications, especially the Freak. As an owner of the original, which is still a chunky watch, there is a bias on...
If the original Freak is chunky, then the Cruiser is a monster.
I have nothing against big watches, as long as the proportions of the case are still harmonious. With the Cruiser, I have mixed feelings: I do like the new lugs a lot, but not the rest of the case. And its dimensions, too. And the new styled bezel, even i...
Cruiser but really...
... both are almost equally beautiful, though my preference is with the cruiser.