For clients who need to see what's Inside their Watch, at the risk to see something which is not consistent with the era it si supposed to refer to. ( Dial is clearly inspired form the end 30ies, Mid 40ies ), while the movement is clearly inspired from the end 60ies...
I am always surprised by the feeling the brands have that it is mandatory for clients to see what's Inside...
At least a solid case back would have reduced this incoherence, and that paradox: Clearly not the most famous Watch from the brand ( if this watc has ever existed ), so apparently reserved to the " Cogonscienti", but who will not go for it because of its incoherence...
Sometimes, I have hard time to follow...
Best,
Nicolas.