But I think of all the perpetuals out there, I like the Glashutte Original Senator Perpetual the most. It may have not have a 8 day reserve, alarm or even chronograph complication (like Zenith El Primero), but its dial is the easiest to read and the display windows are not all over the places (compared to the UN models). JMHO.
Blue
But if chosing a 'simple' (no other complication) perpetual, I would go for the Moser.
The Jaeger LeCoultre is a bit too thick and the dial too busy for my liking, and I realy like the 'understatement' of the Moser (you can't really tell it is a perpetual calendar beacause it doesn't have many dials, but it still is a perpetual calendar, which achieves its perpetual functionality without any show-off)
I think I would even have removed the power reserve indication on the Moser dial, to keep only the basics: H/M/S / date (perpetual)
Not as quick to read as the GO, but I appreciate the dial simplicity.
Blue
...I guess I should think before typing.... ;-)
Regards!
Suitbert
I can appreciate other pieces from other brands, too.
I saw, sadly only in pics, this Moser...
This is indeed a beautiful pc ,and an interesting alternative for those who want to add a pc to their collection.
I appreciate a lot its complex and original simplicity.
The only reserve I have is that if you need to service it, where will you send your watch, and when you need to do it, will this brand still exist?
In fact, for complicated watches, I'm a bit suspicious on this matter...Maybe I'm wrong, as I don't have the ambition to know all, but this is one of my worries...
Best.
Nicolas
If you are talking only about the JLC models, and I presume you are in your overview above, then it is the Squelette for me without any hesitation. It may not be the easiest perpetual to read, but it is stunning! One of my very favorites among all brands, categories and models. I definitely have a preference for openworked dials and this one takes it to the extreme -- and so beautifully. Among perpetuals I tend to like GO and UN easy-to-read models without extraneous sub dials, but the Master 8 Days Perpetual Skeleton totally undermines my own preferences. I must admire this one from a distance, but it is painful.
Great post as usual, my friend. Thanks for a good mid-afternoon amusement.
respo
I'm leaning slightly toward the skeleton version but agree that it's really not easy to read. (Yes the same problem for the minute repeater but we 'hear' the time instead of reading the time so that's ok there!) I think the Rose Gold version of the skeleton perpetual might do better in terms of readability... Let's see.
Nicolas - Thank you for the excellent post. Your knowledge of watches and your skills at photography make reading your post more than a pleasure but an education. I would recommend my friends wanting to know more about JLC to come here and ready your posts. Thank you again.
I like the JLC Master Control Perpetual because of its size (especially the case thinness). The calendar-setting mechanism is also one of the simplest with a single pusher to set all indicators.
The GO perpetual with its window indicators and large date is the easiest to read (IMHO) of all perpetuals.
The Moser has an elegant, uncluttered design which is very appealing. And setting is simple and can be done bi-directionally (I believe).
tempusfugit
(I dont know what happended but somehow my post got lost while writing, but Ill try again since I have some time)
First I would like to say thank you for the huge effort you put in to keeping this forum interesting and educational. You spoil us with great posts and reviews giving us insight to to the history and capabilities of JLC. I, for one, appreciate and enjoy it.
The A. LeCoultre is a gorgous watch. And I guess JLCs pursuit in making a serious classical perpetual calendar watch the JLC way. It looks and feels JLC IMO, both in the good way. and a little of the bad. I agree with you that the dial side is quite succesfull. . Some here compare it to Moser, but its not a good comparison. While some like very simple dials others prefer this style. It is matter of taste choosing an other category, but I say this one, for a complicated dial with lots of indexes, it is simply damn good looking.
The proportions of the case feels good but slightly to the fat side for me. The sunburst stribes of the movement is a very nice way to finish the almost closed plates. However when I saw it in the metal I could not help thinking that the finish was not quite precise enough in the execution. We have touched this topic and I know JLC is trying to improve on this matter. Your other (small) critique points I very much agree on. It seems JLC are very succesful with this watch, but maybe the last little bit is missing.
If one likes the concept of a manual wind Perpetual calender is a matter of taste though. I for one, would forget to wind it, even with the PR of 8 days, luckily not everyone is as silly as me
( I know you can get winder contraptions for manual winds, but it shure looks a bit too complicated. well I never tried it)
The skeletonzed PC I havent experienced yet. But the pics. leve me BREATLESS. really. it seems pure, classical and modern at the same time. The way they use the globe motief as the "main plate" is just cool. It looks very complete - but I have yet to see it.
The grande reveil, I dont click with. I like both complications ( I love memovox) and the idea with vibrator is VERY cool. The idea of combining these two complications makes sense too BUT: The watch feels and wears way to thick IMO - not very elegant. And the dial! I think needs a review from the design department. Even though they chose a strict lay-out it could do with a simplification. The design seems to be an unsuccesfull blend of a classical dress watch and a tool/sports watch. Maybe its due to the red colurs and the white painted alarm hand that gives me the image that they tried to "blend in a bit of toolwatch". My overall image is that its a great concept that never "ripened" well.
The MC black dial is a darling of mine. It has a timeless quality to it. Elegant and thin on the wrist. Classical.... Its very Stealth. And it has a nice automatic cal 889 (also used by Vacheron Constantin to my memory) I have the Master Moon annual version of this watch. I sometimes consider changing it to the Perpetual. lets see what happens.
Favorites? for me it may stand between the Skeletal and the black dial MC, but I have yet to see the Skeletal
all the best
COD
This message has been edited by ChristianOfDenmark on 2008-07-24 02:41:33
HURRAAAAAAAAAAAA. just this minute I got a note from the post office. I can go and pick up my MC Annual Calendar. Its back from a complete service in Le Sentier. 2 and a half months - not too bad.
Best
COD
(I must be going now)
just picked it up. I got a little more than i paid for. (800 euro) Seems they put a nick in the bezel. Not quite shure what to do its about 1 mm long on the inner edge of the bezel at 2 o clock. I just tried to phone the AD who is 400km away. His busy but will call back. Im not gonna throw a hissy fit but shurely im disappointed.
Any advice please?
COD
Of course I didnt take pictures of it before......... LOL But of course thats the thing to do in the future.
You see above the "5" on the date ring. It looks a bit deep for polishing because it cuts in to the edge.
What do you guys think should I just live with it?

kind regards
COD