I still have a couple, laying around. I don't mind the desto's configuration, just the 217 vs the 127, that's all

in my mind. I've looked for it, I've bought it and I've never.....liked it. It has been the first 47mm I've re-sold and I've never looked back on, nor regretted the decision. I didn't sell it "for the money", I did it because I didn't like it nor used it.

Don't know who to credit for, but I will happily do it on request. Another oneI owned and regret... Best, Nicolas

the tobacco dial is exquisite together with the Titanium. I have to confess I did toss the coin in the air, a couple of times. I had a lot of destros back then but, owning the 217 put a dumper on the purchase

It’s funny I still get excited over a clone copy of the original PreV series. I guess after all I have been Paneristi before. But is this watch good news or bad news for the brand? Fwiw, most collectors feel the price is too much but I reckon some might s

You're pictures clearly display the beauty of the 127! I agree, the ideal is a 372 AND 127--both are icons. I'm always struck by how Panerai fans (myself very much included) feel the need to create personal rules or definitions of "purity" to guide their

Your post made me smile – and also made me dive back into the archives. As far I have found out just two Panerai models actually seem to show “1950” on the dial: the PAM 127 and the PAM 375. The 217 has the same beautiful case, but no “1950” text. So… the

From the affordable, PAM 587/673: The PAM 217: To the Elusive: PAM 267 ( 6 pieces ), from 2008: And the PAM 1346 GUIDO PANERAI & FIGLIO, piece unique in platinum: Best, Nicolas

and then the other 47mm ones. Uncompromising PANERAIS. No 44, 42, 40, 38.....no nano-ones No,..."if only I had a bigger wrist ones"! I still have most of them laying around (a couple I have gifted away) to my super "panerista"' nephew. Another couple I've