WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Audemars Piguet

ha, ha, ha, ha!

 

Guess I have pressed the wrong buttons. smile

I agree with you vintage legendary historical pieces should not be meddled at all. I am not suggesting that we take a 1973 Royal Oak 2121 and replace the parts (if that could be done). To do that would kill the history of the significant watch.

Ya, it was a great technological achivement in 1973 to produce a 3.05mm auto movement, thus all the cal.2121 in the 70s are historically significant as Vintage pieces. But that history was made 30 years ago. 

What I am referring to is the 2121 produced say in 2008. It is a NEW watch. Made in the 21st century. If there are alternative better materials to improvise the watch (maybe ceramic and silicon are not qualified-not tested like you said), why not? So that the 2121 can continue to create NEW history. Something like what Patek is doing for the 315?

It all boils down to whether a new movement manufactured today based on a 1973 specs would make this particularly piece in question instantly historical?

Really appreciate your patience on ignorant me.

Pat

 

 

  login to reply
💰1479 Marketplace Listings for Audemars Piguet