this_hobby_of_hours
3596
Interesting question
I think of the 15202 as a little more fragile compared to the 15300.
Both are 39 mm and this was a big factor for me in deciding to get the 15300 almost 20 years ago. 39 mm is the ideal size if your wrist can handle it IMHO.
Finally my new 15202st
By: TimeMachine : April 10th, 2025-12:32
I must say, I am still remarkably impressed with my new 15202. (Bought it from a friend) Its impact continues to genuinely surprise me, which is something I didn't fully anticipate. Owning both the 15510ST and a Royal Oak Chronograph 39mm, I perhaps assum...
15202
By: Eikþyrnir : April 18th, 2025-20:36
There is just something about the jumbo. The proportions of the case and bezel, the size and weight of it makes it outstanding. There is of course the watch, however there is always the next one!
They are quite different
By: TimeMachine : May 1st, 2025-06:44
They seem to have the same 39mm size but the case is thicker and a very different movement. The jumbo is so thin it’s amazing all other royal oaks are bigger. And it’s quite crazy. There is a space in your collection for each as they all wear differently ...