WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Audemars Piguet

Thanks, Pink Panther...

 

I really appreciate the effort to try to explicate the assumptions to someone who may not agree, but may not disagree either! but who is really interested in understanding the reasons behind.

The funny thing is, I have no problem with people simply saying, "I like this" or "I don't like this."

That's fine, and a statement of personal taste and opinion.

But when the comments specifically question the validity or "integrity" of a statement made in good faith (I assume) or marketing/business decisions thereof, I would expect a bit more than "I don't believe this" or "I have trouble swallowing that" as the challenge is deeper and more profound than simply differences of opinion and taste.

I wonder if the previous makes sense?

In a more general way, positive comments need no explanation; afterall, that is the assumption in a community of interested individuals.  Unless you are a heckler, the assumption is that participants at a bowling tournament actually likes bowling. (replace bowling with golf, wrestling, cars, watches, knives, guns, fishing reels, gucci slippers, whatever...)

Criticism, even the most sincere ones, reasonably warrant polite requests to understand through more clarification.

Are these so assumptions so hard to understand or unreasonable? (not directed at you, PP)

Anyway, thanks, Pink Panther, and I'll come back to your comments to read them again and again to try to understand the points made and their implications.

Chapeau,

TM

  login to reply