Hi,
I know many/most of the knee jerk reactions towards Limited Edition ROOS, and some of them I have tried (mostly futilely) to explain that the LE's are to celebrate specific anniversaries, special events, etc (as Mr. Merk said) and that AP has tended to be more "accomodating" than most other brands (remember the Dominos Pizza Rolex Datejust? The Comex Sub? The Tiffany's Patek?) but what's the problem with that? If the consumer doesn't like the LE (Pride of China, Pride of Russia; the Montauk Highway; the Rodeo Drive) just don't buy it. I really am left scratching my head what the problem is...
But in reading your posts here over the past year or so, I've always found your comments and posts to be well thought out and reasonable, so I am especially interested to read what, exactly, you see as the issue with so many and varied "special limited editions?"
Yes, there is emphasis on the ROO as there would be for any company for which any one model line makes up 50% or more of its turnover.
Lot's of emphasis? Sure, why not? But OVER-emphasis? Again, I'd love to read your further thoughts on this.
I recall many times reading gasps of joy, "Boy, I am so glad to see more comments and posts on the Millenary" or "Jules Audemars" model lines.
And then I read nothing more...um, so where's the disconnect?
Cheers,
TM