Jay (Eire)
12311
Always think this watch makes Roman’s look somewhat contemporary.
I do like it, and generally I do like dials with Roman numerals where they have a more modern feel. In this watch it just looks a lot more modern in style and that catches my eyes always.
The opposite are watches like the original Datograph, the Patek 5035 (not to single them out, but they just come to mind easily), where for my taste the roman numerals give the watch a more dated feel.
Just my personal taste of course.
An old love: Chopard L.U.C Quattro in Platinum.
A lot to love, here: Best, Nicolas ...
It's a truly beautiful model.
And it wears much nicer on the wrist than one could think. ...
Indeed, it was very much to my taste
and I could have been tempted, but I already have the caliber 98 and, in this 43 mm case it looks small. Also, the 43 mm case, despite being much more wearable than I expected, is on the larger side for my wrist nonetheless.
Yes, since I found it ~10 days ago.
I picked up this 2016 ref. 161926-5003 in Shibuya. I'm dropping it off for service next week.
That really is a stunning looking Chopard L.U.C Quattro in Platinum.
My love for the maison LUC Chopard is no secret by now and watches like this beauty is why, even the relatively simple movement side is still quite beautiful. Just one question though as I am slightly confused I understand the date display with inner and ...
Always think this watch makes Roman’s look somewhat contemporary.
I do like it, and generally I do like dials with Roman numerals where they have a more modern feel. In this watch it just looks a lot more modern in style and that catches my eyes always. The opposite are watches like the original Datograph, the Patek 503...
A very beautiful watch.
Chopard was never really on my radar and I regret that. They are now though 😁
