ei8htohms
8555
I agree wholeheartedly
Hi Brad,
A GO co-ax would be pretty hard to touch. It seems we're likely to see a co-axial Blancpain before a GO though (from what I've heard here and there: meaning lacking substantiation 
).
_john
NEWS ! NEWS !! NEWS !!! - What we'll see from GO within the next two years ...
The German watchmag CHRONOS published a nice article on GO in its recent no. 4 of 2002, and there are some very interesting news, too. First of all: Already this year, in autumn, we are likely to see the first examples of a selfwinding PanoReserve movemen...
Where have we seen this design before?
Patek Philippe's very high end (~US$100,000?) automatics have a similar configuration of the winding rotor (I believe this PP movement is designated: Cal. R27). Very sensible idea, in my opinion, for the obvious reasons that it gives more winding power th...
You are right....
and your point is obviously more relevant. I checked my Lange catalog.... I'm more "into" PP than Lange, so I saw what I was attentive to. But obviously, now that you point it out, GO is going "head to head" with Lange on this one. Question: Will it be a ...
Differences in product philosophies ...
While Lange introduced its Sax-O-mat from the beginning to have at least one self-winding watch in its league of wonderful handwindings, GO's focus was on automatics from the beginning. However it was clear, that the proven cal. 39 would barely enter into...
N I H (Not Invented Here)
You wrote: "I am convinced we will never see the Daniels-escapement in a GO. GO is striclty following the rule now, that everything within their movements is completely designed and developed inhouse." There is a way in which this can be most desirable an...
