amanico[JLC Moderator]
400446
You are absolutely right, Art...
For those who bought the Platinum, it is not really a good sign.
BUT, the SC also exists in WG and in RG, so it was never a " rare " watch.
It would have been worse if G.O started with a LE in platinum, then with some non LE in WG, RG, and SS.
Just a thought...
Best,
Nicolas. This message has been edited by amanico on 2011-02-12 10:10:30
Agreed...
By: patrick_y : February 16th, 2011-21:39
There is always two perspectives that need to be considered. And which of the two achieves the greater good and which of the two choices implies great integrity. While it may be to the benefit of the masses to have a Senator Chronometer in a steel variant...
for now it is ok but...
By: stere : February 14th, 2011-05:09
...for later? Who knows. I also asked GO and they gave me the same answer. The Chronometer is a running piece and why should they change this policy. Maybe in a couple of years, when it sells not so good then they will change the mind. You will see. BUT: ...
It's a signature piece.
By: mac : February 14th, 2011-06:01
If they care about the collector, they won't put it out in SS. It's not like they have all this extra capacity to begin with. While my preference would be for SS, I know it is not in the best interest of the brand. My only hope would be is that they would...
I doubt it
By: Dr Bill : February 14th, 2011-07:59
Their other 'high-end' pieces are not offered in steel. Specifically, the PanoMatic Chronograph, Senator Rattrapante, Panotourbillon, and PanoMatic Tourbillon come to mind. There may be others. Maybe if they put it in a Navigator case or a Sport Evo case ...
Ok, the truth is....
By: crabman : February 15th, 2011-14:52
.... I would like the watch better without the date. That would bring inline with what I feel is one of the most timeless and compelling of the classic designs. Still the question remains for those who enjoy collecting, would you still feel that your piec...