WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Horological Meandering

Great article, Ping!

 

Every time I read one of your articles, I'm floored by your flowing prose.  Really, you are one of our great writers, regardless of subject!  Kudos on that.

Returning to the subject at hand, I think turnover has a lot to do with several factors facing the collector/purchaser.  Some people cycle through buying/selling to fund higher priced pieces.  They may really love the outgoing watches, but can only afford the "reach" pieces by sacrificing existing items. 

Some people fall in/out of love quickly -- it doesn't matter if we're talking watches, women, stamps, etc.  I think for those folks the novelty factor you mention is key. 

I've often talked about my watches as if we're in a relationship, and as in many relationships familiarity breeds contempt.  The longer you wear a watch, the more you notice those tiny little details that irk you or the lugs are just a shade too sharp after it's been strapped to your wrist for an eight-hour day at the office.  Those watches end up languishing in the safe or move to new homes.

For me, the most successful horological relationship comes from having a personal connection to the timepiece.  Those are the watches that remain in the watchbox long after others have come and gone.  The great thing about these keepers is that they can be anything -- they aren't necessarily the most expensive or horologically significant pieces in a collection. 

Nice reading you, Ping.

Cheers,
Daos

  login to reply