"Are our watches depending on our life style, or is our life style influenced by our watches?" What a great question. My truth is neither. I often want watches that are not suitable for my lifestyle, but just because they strike my fancy or push some buttons. Maybe if I get a diver, I will start diving, however...nah, doubtful.
I wonder why so many of us get bitten by the diving watch bug, when we have no intention to dive nor need for such watches. First of all, one must distinguish between diving and swimming watches. I would not include either the EWA (Tides or otherwise) or the PP5167 among diving watches -- they are more for casual swimming, no? Ah, but what beautiful swimmers they are! They are both, to me, very luxurious sportswatches, but just outside of the true diving class.
I fully agree with your observation, "You never get done with JLC!" I could easily welcome almost any number of additional JLCs onto my wrist and every year there seems to be yet another object of my desire from Le Sentier. Which brings me to another thought, Jerome: I do not think you need both re-editions of the Polaris and the Navy Seal alarm and the AMVOX1 -- really, you are too greedy with the JLC alarms. I propose that you allow your 65 Polaris to migrate to my collection, where it would find a happy home and would not be jealous of the other alarms on your wrist.. I have no alarm yet, after all. ;-)
And don't get rid of your suits. Just add wet suits to your collection.
Thanks for the intersting Sunday post.
respo