What I wanted and "got" from a Panerai, has been there, it's there and will be there for quite sometime to come. Where have the Swiss taken Panerai and why? Frankly, my dear
But there has to be a big change towards higher movement quality, transparency and in general towards honesty with customers until I buy a watch from this brand again. Best Thomas
Yet it seems Paneraihas no desire for such things. Let us hope we're wrong and Panerai apologizes and in the future is fully transparent. Love the style, yet it seems Richemont is allowing their Panerai brand to...... you know.
Why do these facts come out just now.? The author must have known this for a longer time. But nevertheless the facts speak a clear language. It's really sad!! Best Thomas
saw these posts over and over. seems awfully personal. i get not liking a company but a year or two ago they were threadcrapping any and every panerai thread.
What I wanted and "got" from a Panerai, has been there, it's there and will be there for quite sometime to come. Where have the Swiss taken Panerai and why? Frankly, my dear
Maybe that explains why another Richemont brand JLC sold me a Duoface that had to be returned three separate times for new replacement watches and then finally, forced me to retain an attorney to obtain a cash refund. Shameful!
As then ETA will technically be an 'in-house' movement. Perhaps Richemont has mistakenly provided non-public tradable information. Sell Richemont, buy Swatch stock?
It's pretty amazing to go to Panerai's website and see that the movement from my 973 that they used to call "OPXXXIV" and list on their website as non-in-house is now called "P.900" and listed on their website as in-house. This is straightforwardly decept...
Pandora's box, what's inside is bits and parts of the SAME fiasco. The entity of the "sin" remains the same. You can break a window only once, then you can analyze all the...factors...that contributed to the breakage. I have written so many times, in a co...
till even now that many watch companies slightly modified mass produced ebauche, I.e. change or engrave logo on the rotor and etc. and claims in in-house movement. It the buyer choice to decide. No point harbouring about it when it an industry practise.
It all started with a secret, from a laboratory of ideas to a financial organization distributing “luxury” ephemeral products too often against the interests and movements of the present time. Regardless the motivations I find this extremely disappointing...
Nobody but us gives a damn about what's inside. There might be a spinning wheel moved by micro hamsters and people would still be amazed. Economy of scale, they say.
different types of whatces I have bought, JUST because the strap matched the colour of my socks at the time of purchase, I'd probably have to expell myself from this very forum