Tim_M
1447
A Wonderful Exchange
I'm glad that my thoughts on timepieces and their times were well-received; I certainly enjoyed the opportunity to consider the matter.
It will be fascinating to see what direction design and style (not to mention the world itself) take from this point forward. There is a sense that so much flux occurring so quickly has generated a real nervous energy that could be harnessed for good or ill.
What form will new styles of expression take? We'll have to find out. It's rarely the arbiters of high style who launch the true innovations; breakthroughs tend to start at the margins of culture. (e.g., the Tango, Manga Art, Rock and Roll...). We must be ready to confront the future art and craft with an open mind. They could be inspired by anything from austerity movements to computer culture to Higgs' gravity theory. If artists drew connections between Einstein and Dadaists, it's hard to say how new ideas could become manifest across disciplines.
True innovations in style are not always well-received by those with overly discriminating taste. Most of the reactionary movements of the 30's railed against modern art... rock and roll was supposed to corrupt the youth during the 50's!
I do think PuristS have more sense of adventure than that (MB&F "Frog," anyone?), so hopefully we'll be able to spot and discuss new forms of art as they emerge
The next few years should be quite a journey...
Cheers
Its as much an icon
By: gqmagic : October 3rd, 2010-14:42
as a 15300 is. Actually I had a 15300 for a while and find the 5167 to be better at ahat they do than the 15300. Better legibility, fabulous luminova, better wr, easier to accurately set the time (no jumping minute hand). More comfortable. Was thinking of...
Aquanaut
By: ct9653 : October 3rd, 2010-19:19
I've gotta say, the Aquanaut strikes me as more stylish, more iconic of the 20th century "modern" look than the Nautilus. I know it's the lower-priced model, but I honestly see it as an improvement in terms of appearance, for the following reasons. The Na...
2010 as the era of giants?
By: ct9653 : October 3rd, 2010-21:18
Thanks, Tim - as you pointed out in your September post about the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Compressor's Art Deco "zing" (spot on), there's an energy to various eras. I think we often see the energy best from a distance of a decade or so. I couldn't agree w...
Change is good
By: ct9653 : October 5th, 2010-11:15
Agreed, Tim, the current stormy financial climate is only a part of the story of our times. You make an encouraging point about new ideas and styles being the product of tension throughout history. As they say, a lot of squeezing and burning a lump of coa...
A Wonderful Exchange
By: Tim_M : October 6th, 2010-20:33
I'm glad that my thoughts on timepieces and their times were well-received; I certainly enjoyed the opportunity to consider the matter. It will be fascinating to see what direction design and style (not to mention the world itself) take from this point fo...
Neither ;-)
By: Zeitgeist : October 4th, 2010-00:22
If you ask me, the true icon is the RO, designed some 4 years before the Naut, if I'm not mistaken. You could even say the Naut is a knock-off of the RO, having seen the big success this new concept had. Heresy?
Agreed 100%
By: Grisar : June 8th, 2014-08:52
Very well said. It's all about design, functionality and the wearer. A successful Nautilus doesn't make Aquanaut a less watch. My Aquanaut gets much longer wrist time than any other Patek I own including Nautilus.
Thanks.....
By: Baron - Mr Red : June 10th, 2014-01:59
. .....I meant every word. I was in an AD yesterday and tried on a Patek minute repeater tourbillon. Retails at over £400k. Now that such a watch has been on my wrist, I am not sure I can ever try on a Nauti again as it would feel so wrong to wear such a ...