Revilo
157
Aquanaut
Apr 09, 2024,13:27 PM
Hello friends,
I am noticing that ALL Patek Aquanauts are listed on the Patek Philippe website as WR to 30 m, even including the 5167A. Are others aware of this change? Can anyone shed light on this, is this a marketing maneuver of some kind? I was always so impressed with the 120 m rating for these.
Thank you!
Comments:
view entire thread
Aquanaut
By: Revilo : April 9th, 2024-13:27
Hello friends, I am noticing that ALL Patek Aquanauts are listed on the Patek Philippe website as WR to 30 m, even including the 5167A. Are others aware of this change? Can anyone shed light on this, is this a marketing maneuver of some kind? I was always...
😂😆
By: Ivan5 : April 9th, 2024-14:00
Wow
By: Krinck : April 9th, 2024-14:39
How can they make an AQUAnaut less water resistant hahaha? Maybe rename it to the Nottooclosetowaternaut?
Ha
By: Revilo : April 9th, 2024-14:41
or AquaNOT
:)
By: amanico : April 9th, 2024-15:50
I saw the following explanation on another forum.
By: pessoa00 : April 9th, 2024-15:51
Apparently it comes from the press kit. Personally I find it very confusing that now 5326g has the same WR as a 5167a Unified criteria for water-resistance To ensure the homogeneity and clarity of the information provided to clients, Patek Philippe has de...
Interesting
By: Revilo : April 9th, 2024-23:20
So they are basically saying, since we are unable to achieve=water resistance with CERTAIN models in there Aquanaut and Nautilus lines, we will just bring the standard down for all of them to the lowest common denominator? Well the interesting point, on a...