Bruno.M1
4833
chronographs, chronographs and chronographs
Imo a minute repeater is not the most important in a watch collection. It's personal taste ofcourse but I would not buy a minute repeater or tourbillon. I like those watches and I appreciate the complication but it's not for me.
If I had the money I would buy ALL the chronographs, starting with the 5070 (4 pce) the 5970 (4pce) and even the 5004 (Just to own it in the collection but it's too small to wear for me). Afterwards the 5960 and 5980 would follow. And if your budget allows it, why not search some vintage like 3970, 2499, 1518, 130 ...
that's easy
By: eric.vonschonberg : November 3rd, 2009-02:22
The 5016 has perpetual calendar, tourbillon, and minute repeater. Tourbillon doesn't do anything useful in a wristwatch (only pocket watches benefit when vertical in vest pocket as worn in the 1800s). Minute repeater hasn't been useful since electricity w...
Actually no..
By: TimAbz : November 3rd, 2009-20:20
..I have a 5101P already....very nice watch. I have seen only pictures of a salmon dial/breguets 5016P...loved it. The 5004P is a great watch - one of my favourites...sent it to the factory for the upgrade on the chrono to make it reliable, as mine is one...
I really like the 5074
By: patrick_y : November 3rd, 2009-18:53
Personally, I prefer the 5074 over the 5016. I just really love the bezel on the 5074 (which is the same bezel as the 5070). My ultimate collection would be a 5074, 5078, 5070, and 5970. This is of course a dream. The 5004 is a great watch and Split-secon...
great advices.....
By: vic93 : November 4th, 2009-01:38
This topic does not have a easy answer.....one ultimate vs few good collections. I agree that most of the functions are not very useful in this century. However, I do have a passion on minute repeater....it "talks" to you instead of you read it......plus ...