rishi_77
134
Thanks Mike!
There's a ton of references with Patek...and thats why I love this blog, taking cues from many enthusiasts knowledge. Like a flow chart actually...till you find something you like. So I have this in my mind...around 33 to 36mm, no date window, ideally with hobnail, I seem to love the crown guard design with seamless lugs and case , even better with a display caseback...micro rotor if possible...and yellow gold.
Basically to be a good no 3 after my RG 5098, and white gold 5124g.
I aim for 90s and beyond mainly out of reliability concerns (psychological comfort perhaps). Also...I enjoy greater craftwork element...hence the enamel dial and hobnail bezel affinity. I'll put this up in a new post...and just get opinions and ideas.
Thank you once again Mike....
Rishikesan
Patek 3796dj vs 5196j..which would be the choice for a first calatrava?
I must say the hobnail effect on the 3796dj looks gorgeous...but how would I feel about a 30.5/ 31mm case diameter against the 37mm of the 5196. My wrist is around 16cm, and I guess trying both on would be the only way of knowing. Have any of you had the ...
It all depends on your wrist size! :-)
I find the 5196 too large for me even though it is a 37mm watch due to the flared lugs. Pity really as it is a gorgeous classic watch.
The correct answer may be 5096 ...
I also found 5196 very large on my 6.6 inch wrist but 3796 is just to small for my liking. If I had wanted YG I would have tried to find a nice 5096 but in the end I got a similarly sized 3998P at the time.
+1...better size for a 16mm wrist and better subdial placement given the small cal. 215 movement size.
And with the bonus of an available see-through case back.
Dear Rishi,
My experience is that the ref. 5196P doesn't wear well on my 16 cm wrist because the lug-to-lug dimension is too large. I'll let you judge based on the photo below. So, I think I would choose the 3796, especially since some photos online let me think that...
Thank you Emmanuel...
I have a strong feeling, the 5196 will look like a pie pan on my wrist. I just worry about the extra small dial of the 3796 although I think its gorgeous . I will likely post another topic....to get opinions of the 5115 vs 3796. That's where my mind is go...
Ideally of course, it would be great to see each reference in person.
But I know how difficult it is, unfortunately. Best wishes to you, Emmanuel
What about a 5032?
you lose the small seconds but you win the small rotor movement 240
Thank you Amanico..
Judging from Emmanuels pics, I know the 5196 will be too big for me
All are nice Patek Philippe Calatrava watches.
But as you say you have around a 16cm wrist and you seem to prefer the style of the 3796 that would be my choice, after all it is a dress watch and as such is meant to look subtle and discreet. Also I have found that when moving to what I at first felt wa...
Sorry if I bring some confusion in your mind instead of a solution…
Of course I can only agree that both 3796 and 5196 have a beautiful design but as many have mentioned the case design of 5196 is such that it looks odd on a 16cm because of the lug to lug dimension. On the other hand the 3796 is really small and unless yo...
You're absolutely right!
So I thought about this...35mm, that i know will be the good sweet spot. I have always had an eye for the 5115, partly also because I don't want something too old, plus I want an element of craft which can be seen with the bezel plus the enamel dial. Rish...
I also believe 35mm would be the perfect size
There is actually a number of options for Calatravas in 35mm size... and only you can decide according to your personal choice. For example you mention you don't want something "too old". I would recommend don't take something "dated" which is not quite t...
Thanks Mike!
There's a ton of references with Patek...and thats why I love this blog, taking cues from many enthusiasts knowledge. Like a flow chart actually...till you find something you like. So I have this in my mind...around 33 to 36mm, no date window, ideally wit...
