WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

that's a decision I do not understand

 



I spoke 2 or 3 guys who were in London and indeed, it seems like they made 5 or so  extra 5070 and 5970 ( or was it 3970?)

I honestly don't understand and even don't like this. a discontinued reference should stay discontinued.  No reason is imo good enough to bring those back to life. What is next ? A few extra 2499 ?
This is my personal opinion but it is imo not good for the brand. 

Don't want to compare Patek with Panerai but Panerai did this in the past.  ' for example ref PAM26'.  A collector is happy to have a nice sought after discontinued piece and suddenly they decide to make EXACTLY the same watch again a few years later. This is one of the reasons why I turned my back to Panerai

I would accept something like the ref 5105, a wonderful watch they made in 2006 for the Geneva boutique. They found some old stock 9-90 movements and put them in a great watch. But at least it was a different watch than  the pieces they made between 1930 and 1950 with the same movement. It was a tribute to these old pieces … BUT it was different.  A ref 5105 is not at all the same as a 460, 1450, 2442, 2471, ….

Another possibility, use an existing case but use a caliber from another era. Ref 2411 ( also cal 9-90) is known as the  'Eifel Tower, also a watch from the 1940's
Later we had the Pagoda ref 5500. At first sight similar looking  BUT  … a bigger case, another movement, another reference.

This time  … the same watch, the same movement, the same case and even the same reference  ??? I really do not understand this.

  login to reply
💰1729 Marketplace Listings for Patek PhilippePatek Philippe Calatrava · 2 for sale · 8309 discussions