quattro
[Moderator]
19394
Yes, I think that, in order to fully appreciate this watch,
you have to forget about the Nautilus and pretend you don’t even know it exists. With the Nautilus in mind, the Cubitus can only be considered as a lazy rip off. But if you forget about it and just think about how it feels on your wrist, it’s far from unappealing though disappointing as far as the movement is concerned imo.
Also, if you forget about the Nautilus, the octagonal square shape of the dial and case isn’t something you often see and I consider it original in this regard. And could fully understand someone who would prefer the Cubitus over the Nautilus because of this less common square shape.
Best, Emmanuel
Hands-on with the 40 mm Cubitus
Last August, I was able to try on the rose gold 40 mm Cubitus, ref. 7128/1R-001. On a small 16 cm wrist like mine, the size feels good and the sunburst brown dial is really appealing . The 8.5 mm thickness and the very r efined construction and finishing ...
Looks good on your wrist 😊👏🏻
Not exactly my style and as much as I appreciate the attempt of introducing more shaped watches that will likely sell, I cannot but feel that it’s a low effort and low cost attempt at doing so - recycle as many design elements of the Nautilus as possible,...
I completely agree with you:
it’s a poor attempt with a lot of recycling. But if you forget about the Nautilus and consider the watch in itself, it’s far from unappealing though disappointing as far as the movement is concerned. Best, Emmanuel
I am sure there will be many satisfied owners 😊👍🏻
And like you say, if the Nautilus didn’t exist there are quite some appealing aspects to it. But a shaped movement would definitely have been in order 👍🏻
I do not agree, but of course it is only my opion.
The Nautilus is/was a refined shape, and the ears make sense! Vice versa here they are clumsy and meke no sense for this shape. I agree to KMII, low effort from a non-designer to create something new with the elements that were/are successful. A pity for ...
I understand your opinion even if don’t feel exactly the same way.
It may be because I’ve never been very deeply interested in the Nautilus. I don’t know, but all I can say is that the hands on experience with the Cubitus is far from awful, even if I don’t like the movement side of it. Just my personal feeling of course....
The cubitus has grown on me.
I think it looks great on your wrist. And I love the patek RG/chocolate dial combo. A friend just recently purchased the larger SS reference with a green dial. It looks great. If offered I would def purchase.
I also think that if you forget about the Nautilus
and consider the watch in itself it has a real appeal, the movement excepted. Best, Emmanuel
Fully agree
Forgetting the Nautilus; my eye is becoming accustomed and liking the Cubitus.
I’m glad you feel the same.
But it’s a polarizing piece and I can understand that some might dislike it. Best, Emmanuel
Your comment on how you see the cubitus rehabilitating the square share in an original way…
because when I reflect on older pieces you have shared in previous write ups and the recent post by Nico yesterday showing the unique shaped case by Vacheron, the Cubitus on some level elicits an immediate (but brief) negative reaction. I don’t know why, ...
Yes, I think that, in order to fully appreciate this watch,
you have to forget about the Nautilus and pretend you don’t even know it exists. With the Nautilus in mind, the Cubitus can only be considered as a lazy rip off. But if you forget about it and just think about how it feels on your wrist, it’s far from una...
Looks great on your wrist Quattro
For me I have very mixed feelings on this one. Personally I can’t accept it. I don’t own any of the sports Patek. But for me I’d go for a Nautilus first and foremost. Best Gatsby
My feelings are mixed too.
But I think the way one appreciates this watch depends on whether or not you have the Nautilus in mind. If you do, the Cubitus can only considered as a more or less lazy square remake. But if you forget about the Nautilus, the Cubitus is far from unappeal...
I hear you Emmanuel
It is quite hard not to think about the Nautilus when it comes to the Cubitus. Also I do not understand the “need” and the purpose for another sports watch under the Patek catalogue. Which is why I’ve never thought of owning one. One big issue is, with ic...
Like you, I don’t really understand the need of this new line of watches.
And I know of course that it is impossible to forget about the Nautilus when approaching the Cubitus. My point was just to say that this watch, if you look at it with an opened mind, is far from being unattractive even if it’s disappointing as far as the ...
I tried all of the large and the small versions
and independently of my opinion on the design this 40mm is a woman's watch. My wife tried it as well, and it fit her perfectly and she has got very thin wrists.
All I can say is that my wrist is small
and the 40 mm felt ok on it. So I guess the woman model is the right one for me here. Best, Emmanuel
In my opinion, the Cubitus is a missed opportunity
and perhaps not the worst, but certainly the most disappointing new release since I became interested in watches. The significantly more wearable 40mm version doesn't change that for me.
I also think something greater could have been done.
And I also consider that this watch can only be fully appreciated if you forget about the Nautilus. Considered in itself it’s far from unappealing though disappointing as far as the movement is concerned imo. Best, Emmanuel
I do not think that you only can bring it down to „if the Nautilus would not exist“.
Some design elements do not make sense with this shape… Besides that, the Nautilus does exist! 🤷🏼♂️
You might be right, of course,
but it's how this watch made me feel. If I was trying to be honest with myself, I had to recognise that it was, considered in itself, far from being unappealing, even if disappointing as far as the movement is concerned. I know the Nautilus exists, of cou...
The size works well on your wrist !
But then again,I simply do not like the design. In contrast,the Ellipse has so much more class !!
The Ellipse would of course be my choice between the two.
My point was just that, if you forget about the existence of the Nautilus, the Cubitus is far from unappealing even if I find it disappointing as fas as the movement is concerned. Best, Emmanuel
It is an appealing watch.
I prefer the Ellipse and find the movement disappointing but apart from these points, it has some charm. Best, Emmanuel
I actually like the cubitus
in 40mm. My preference would be the white gold model with the blue dial.
I didn’t try it on, unfortunately.
I was more attracted to the brown dial/rose gold combo and didn’t ask to see the blue dial/white gold. Best, Emmanuel
Hi Emmanuel, thanks for your post on a
controversial watch and balanced views on it. I have had the opportunities to try on all versions of the Cubitus. Although I have small wrists like you, I find the 45mm size is large but I could still pull it off because it is thin. When I tried on the 40...
It’s a controversial piece indeed.
But it’s better in real life than I would have thought even if I find the movement disappointing. And the 40 mm size worked for me, especially with this full rose gold example. Best, Emmanuel
Thank you. It felt good on the wrist.
But the Golden Ellipse is more to my taste and, believe it or not, it's €15k cheaper ! Best, Emmanuel
Absolutely fantastic. It was hard not leaving the Boutique with it.
That's how much I loved it. And, believe it or not, it's €15k cheaper than the Cubitus! Best, Emmanuel
Instead of "cheaper", "less expensive" would probably be the better description 😉
But anyway, that's what I call a no brainer 👍🏻 The Ellipse is just fantastic 🥰
Agreed on both counts :
“less expensive” is much better and the Ellipse is fantastic ! 🤩