in a Rolex are chemically hardened, instead of fully heat hardened. To me, that smacks of cheapness.
Patek fully heat hardens their pivots, why not Rolex? Is there a reason for it chronometrically? I cannot
find one.
Agreed with the rest of your comments though. So much of what people love about watchmaking are
complicated delicate mechanisms. Frankly put, such things have no place in a true precision timekeeper.
As a time telling watch, Rolex does the basics, uncomplicated, very very well. It is a watchmaker's watch.
Designed from the ground up to have everything either replaceable or adjustable. Basically, it will keep
time as its main goal, and always lend to being fixed.
In 200 years from now, I can safely say that no one will be wearing something like a RM or Hublot. They
are not such things that a lone watchmaker can adjust and fix the way a Rolex is made to be. There will
be Rolexes in operation or capable of being serviced or fixed long after I'm dead.
That kind of reliablity, no matter how stodgy or branded, is worth something.