It definitely looks like an Oysterquartz.
A buddy sent it to me so Iām going by what he said. Heās usually āin the knowā on these things. Otherwise I screwed up š
Sorry, I donāt get it.
Just seems like a mish-mash of old design cues and a random decoration on the dial. That being said Iām a fan of the Oysterquartz style case. I wonder how big it is. Guess Iām not interested enough to look it up š¤·š¼āāļø.
Now I believe it.
But nevertheless, I would stick with the original Oysterquartz, too. The proportions of case and bezel are more to my taste.
Doesn't need the matching luggage approach of collection name on the dial
Feels busy, if it want's to sit with the integrated heavy hitters it needs a more economic dial treatment, the pattern, date, cyclops, excessive text, numbers... overkill. It does look slim though, perhaps as it matures they correct like they did with the...
I gotta say I like it
A nice thin watch. The dial need to see, so far that is the questionable part.
This is odd isnāt it
Rolex leaks a new designā¦ I may be wrong, but they are usually very successful at embargosā¦ Anyway, I see the. mockery starting up. Like the Patek Stupitus, it donāt matta. This will be un-gettable for a good while, and marked up, and on waiting listsā¦ it...
Yeah snooze, š¤ (except the silicon natural dual impulse escapement- the first mass produced one)
š, its the biggest advance since the coaxial But, being silicone it genuinely doesnāt need lubricants I think the biggest aspect of this is being seriously missed Yeah, I already have ordered it.
May be Iām obtuse. But this looks like a date just with a different bracelet.
I love Rolex. But am I wrong here?
I think I like it but.....
the name is awful. Iām thinking recycling centre, rubbish dump. Maybe itās a me problem!!
not my cup of fondue tbh....
federer is the perfect ambassador for this watch.....: "boring"... i know he has a lot of fans, i know he is a nice and family guy, i know he is successful, but also in a way a "teflon" guy...
Haha - funny in its accuracy ;)
And I say this very much being one of those fans myself āŗļøš
Agree on Federer, except
a) he used to have a temper, smash rackets on the court, and most of us tend to get calmer with age, b) the man who played the most beautiful tennis on this planet doesnāt need to be or do anything more exciting than just that, I think, to not be labeled ...
