patrick_y
[PuristSPro Moderator]
33650
Practically the same movement!
The JLC movement is obviously not made of gold and does have wire springs, when the VC version doesn't have wire springs. Otherwise, they're really the same movement, just higher finishing on the VC, Geneva Seal, 18K gold movement plates and bridges, and bar springs that replace the wire springs. The 849 is a great movement. Too bad JLC doesn't make it anymore.
Vacheron Constantin Ultra Thin 1955 Platinum ref 33155.
Absolutely sublime, with a touch of cool, with these blue indices. Best, Nicolas ...
That is a really beautiful Vacheron Constantin Ultra Thin 1955 Platinum ref 33155.
The blue hour markers really make a big difference to the overall look of the dial and in this case even if it is an ultra thin watch a display caseback makes perfect sense when it is showing that beautiful gold 1003 movement. If I could find one I would ...
I don't why but this watch really speaks to me and until this post I didn't even know it existed.
I sort of mean it about selling all it for it bar the Boucheron of course ,but seeing as I am now down to 4 and GADA watch it wouldn't be that hard, but it would be worth it I think. Marc
Simply gorgeous
I was lucky to see it at the Geneva boutique a few years ago. One minor issue, historically, this model has applied markers.
Practically the same movement!
The JLC movement is obviously not made of gold and does have wire springs, when the VC version doesn't have wire springs. Otherwise, they're really the same movement, just higher finishing on the VC, Geneva Seal, 18K gold movement plates and bridges, and ...
You're welcome! The JLC MUT really is high horology! I haven't worn mine in over six months. I have the platinum version somewhere around here too!
The JLC MUT 849 movement may not have high horology finishing, but the thinness alone is already incredibly special!
