Fortune magazine (2nd and 3rd page) released yesterday. Looks like I'm not the target market. I don't look like the guy on the left and I do not have inclination towards the watch on the right.
Another friend has picked up a copy of Fortune Magazine and has told me he's seen the advertisement. It's odd that a few typical consistencies are missing. For example, a Patek Philippe advertisement almost always has a model number on it. This one is lacking a model number.
Why make another line if you had the gondolo. The pagoda is also a good benchmark. Patek is so rich in history. Lastly, is this a grab for Cartiers market? I do hope they made complications or movements for the line.
By: piccolochimico (aka dsgalaxy1) : October 13th, 2024-08:45
It's a squared Nautilus, it does not look that bad either, but did they create a new movement (as I'd expect) or choose an existing one? If the latter, that's really a poor choice