aperna
17208
RG for me. First of all, it’s visually more appealing, and second of all Parmigiani Fleurier aggravated me with they’re extremely poor service.
Which one for you?
Two “ salmon ” dial no - date bracelet watches: Parmigiani vs Romain Gauthier . Do you have a favorite ? Best, Emmanuel 1) Parmigiani Tonda PF Micro Rotor , ref. PFC914-1020021-100182-EN Golden Siena dial with " Grain d'Orge hand-guilloché " finishing Cal...
I completely understand your preference.
The PF is more my style (even if I prefer manual-winding) but it is more classic and conservative. The RG is more playful and extroverted. Best, Emmanuel
Yes, I understand. Who not ALL of them 😁
Natural blonde, perhaps brunette, red head... or all three.
Now that you mentioned it, I can’t unsee the asymmetry in the RG dial
The dial is significantly top heavy due to the hands being mounted closer to the top half of the dial. I searched “Romain Gauthier C” and in most press photos the time is set to 9:12 instead of the traditional 10:08 to “pull” the hands closer to the cente...
I might be wrong,
but I think the canon pinion is exactly at the center of the dial. That said, the Parmigiani is more my style. I like the “less is more” aesthetic and the barley grain dial. Best, Emmanuel
I wouldn’t say that, personally, but, like you,
I prefer the PF. Very classy and classic in its own way. Best, Emmanuel
Between these two the PF but I'd get an RG C2 or C4 over either of those...
While the PF is an eye pleaser it also feels quite boring to me. Never thought about getting one myself. I find the C a lot more edgy and interesting but I have gone back and forth on the dial layout. What I do know is that I am not a big fan of the brace...
Interesting thoughts.
I understand how you feel about the “boring” PF. It’s more my style though, but the RG C is definitely interesting and I understand the appeal of the variants you mention. Best, Emmanuel
It’s my personal favorite too,
but I’m not really into bracelet watches personally. So I admire it from a distance. Best, Emmanuel
Neither.
The Gauthier just fails to move the needle at all for me. The dial on this particular PF is too minimalist. With Parmigiani, I'd look in the Toric line for a salmon-like dial. M4
I personally like the “less is more” aesthetic
and the PF is my favorite. But I’m not enough into bracelet watches nor into automatic movements. Best, Emmanuel
When I win the lottery the PF
Like it's cleaner look & always liked the idea of a micro rotor movement. Cheers JML
Like you, the PF is my favorite,
but, unlike you, I’m not attracted to automatic movements. Best, Emmanuel
I’m really sorry to hear that!
Shame on them. I understand your preference for the RG, which is indeed more daring and sporty. I prefer the aesthetic of the PF, though (not taking into consideration what you say about the customer service). Best, Emmanuel
That can really kill a brand quickly.
I remember you had all kinds of trouble with your Minute Rattrapante. To this day, it is the only issue I have heard of with a modern Parmigiani. For me, it was Montblanc. You would think the 1858 blue dial 100 piece edition is better than sliced bread, b...
It’s also my favorite.
But I prefer manual-winding and I can understand why some prefer the RG. Best, Emmanuel
Same preference for me.
But I still understand the appeal of the more sporty and daring RG. Best, Emmanuel
I see what you mean,
but I think it wouldn’t match the “less is more” aesthetic. I personally like it as is, even though I’m not really a bracelet watch guy… 🤷🏽♂️ Best, Emmanuel
I certainly understand why, Larry!
It’s a very appealing piece indeed. Best, Emmanuel
This particular Tonda PF happens to be on my Want List, the Roman Gauthier is not.
Even if the Gauthier is more horologically impressive. The austerity of the Parmigiani dial, the shape of the hands, the bracelet geometry, the knurled platinum bezel, and the finishing on the microrotor all speak to me in a way that the kooky dial on the...
I agree with you concerning the PF and the RG.
I haven’t yet found an OF which fits my wrist properly, but maybe I should try on the new 37 mm someday. Best, Emmanuel
I agree with you that the thinness of the PF
is a great thing. I also like the minimalist design and barley grain pattern of the dial. Best, Emmanuel
PF for the front, case, and bracelet. RG for the movement.
Ultimately, neither of these two for me. I love these choice-posts!
I agree with you, Michael: it would be the best combination.
And you have a great collection of Tondas (you have three, don't you: MR, Mineral Blue chronograph & GT chronograph?)! Best, Emmanuel
Thanks Sir. It might soon change
I'm a bit heavy on sports chronographs right now, and as I age am finding more interest in simpler, dressier pieces. I think adding the Lorige has punctuated my sports pieces, so I might dip into the Parmigiani pieces to go after something more special.
I also prefer the movement of the RG,
but I personally prefer the more classic and dressy aesthetic of the PF. Best, Emmanuel
My vote goes to the RG ...
I just enjoy that dial design a lot (though Jay's Open-worked is even Cooler!) and the view from the back is exciting to see as well.
I completely understand your preference. The PF is very minimalist
whereas the RG is more dynamic and sporty. Because of my general style I lean towards the PF, but the appeal of the RG is clear. Best, Emmanuel
For me the PF.
The dial of the RG doesn’t feel balanced enough. And if I look longer at the RG I don’t like the position of the crown and I also prefer the bracelet of the PF. But in real life I would refuse both. For my personal taste there are better options out there...
Of course, this comparison has its limits and other options would have to be considered.
I'm with you concerning the PF, though. Best, Emmanuel
Of these 2 I prefer PF
If it would be possible I would take the vack from RG and everything else from PF.
Same feeling for me. The back is the only
thing I like better on the RG. But this is a matter of personal taste of course. Best, Emmanuel