CL,
I understand your points and Barts as well.
Every watch from an independent varies from sample to sample. Without macros we would never notice these subtle differences but these are the quirks we've come to appreciate in our watches since they are truly "hand made". How else do we share our appreciation for luxury goods if not through pictures and discription? Even if Bart could see and hold an Observatoire, what would his sample size be? Your comments are valid and boils down to how much you value "ownership experience". Do the opinions of owners weigh differently than enthusiasts who only admire from a distance? Do you have to own a KV to make worthy comments? Can you be an expert if you held 1 KV? 2 KVs? 10 KVs? Your point...Can you make assertions only based on photos without any real tactile experience?
Yes photography can be especially deceptive given all the different factors, I know that you of all people are well aware of these factors, perhaps Bart does not since he states he is an engineer by profession. Bart has not posted any photos documenting his assertion. He is having trouble with the photoloader. I've pm'd him and I will post the pics he forwards to me when they arrive.
I seriously doubt that Kari would let pieces leave without very close QC but I am sure this area on the second hand will definately be inspected on all his watches from now on if it was not before.
Documentation like the ones Allen have provided are awesome! They only add to our enjoyment of Kari's work and why I am extremely jealous of Allen
I hope Bart's assertion are wrong but let's see his proof
Best and I hope to share another glass of wine/H2O with you and Allen soon
Mike