quattro[Moderator]
19042
Thank you for sharing you critical view on these pieces.
I have a different feeling about them. Roman numerals were also very often featured in previous UJ releases and I think the UJ-1 is a major release, a wonderful homage to the Derek Pratt Oval and an incredible watch in itself.
I'm less excited about the UJ-2 (not fond of the dial design) or UJ-3 (too thick and unnecessarily so).
Best, Emmanuel
Thanks for sharing!
By: ChetBaker : June 7th, 2025-14:24
Very nice dials and movements. Don’t find the short stubby lugs appealing. They also seem to sit akwardly high, making the cases look like hockey pucks (somewhat Dato-esque if that’s a word). Mmm, not convinced by the overall package.
Lovely pieces, all 👌🏻🙌🏻👏🏻
By: KMII : June 8th, 2025-05:42
And quite a coherent restart for the brand. I know Kari is no fan of thinness and while size wise the watches are not too thick in some pictures they look like sitting quite high on the wrist. One would need to try them live for sure 👍🏻 Thanks for sharing...
It is indeed very brave
By: sham1 : June 10th, 2025-18:14
to price the UJ2 time only watch a little higher than a Voutilainen Vingt 8. I love both (and I only buy watches that I love! ) but I think it would have been a smarter move to price the UJ2 below the Vingt 8 and below the 100k CHF psychological threshold...